Judging criteria
The criteria for judging all of the awards are the same. The independent judging panel will assess entries and score them against these headlines:
- Strategy
- Goals and objectives
- Planning and implementation
- Creativity and innovation
- Impacts and benefits
There won’t be a second round of judging with presentations as we want to make the process as efficient as possible.
Judges will use this scoring guidance:
- Outstanding – robust evidence, a compelling description; 8-10 marks
- Good – very good story with some strong evidence; 6-7 marks
- Adequate – reasonable description of achievements and some evidence; 4-5 marks
- Limited – some weak areas, limited evidence available to support story; 2-3 marks
- Weak – unconvincing, lacking evidence; 0-1 mark
Meet the judges
Cllr Darren Byford – Wakefield First
Christine Armstrong – Wakefield BID
Claire Nicholson & Kelly Smith – CAPA College
Keith Madeley MBE – Mr Yorkshire